#WINDOWS CE 6.0 CHROME WINDOWS#

If an application calls to open a memory-backed map file with R/O (read-only) access and suppose there is already an existing map file with the same name opened with R/W (read-write) access. Regarding the view permissions, it is probably easier to explain with an example. You would need to pass offsets to the memory mapped files so that the other process can open the same memory mapped file object (identified by a name) and use the given offset to read/write to the same memory mapped file object. Impact to your application: If your application was passing memory mapped file handles to other processes, other processes wonвЂ™t be able to access the memory mapped file object using those handles. In both cases if the application uses only those functions which are documented as part of the SDK, then we expect minimal or no changes to the application to be able to run on CE 6.0 OS.

#WINDOWS CE 6.0 CHROME WINDOWS#

By the way just to be clear when I say SDK functions, I mean those functions which are available in an installed SDK (for ex: Windows Mobile PPC SDK) or in an exported SDK (for ex: SDK exported from an OS design in Platform Builder). A well-behaved application is typically written using only SDK functions and doesnвЂ™t use any of the undocumented features or any OAL functions or myriad of other things mentioned in this topic (like passing handle values, passing memory pointers, assumptions about internal workings of a component such as memory mapped files etc.). The level of impact to an application depends on how *well behaved* the application is. In most cases the application should just work on CE 6.0 without any porting. Given this, we expect minimal impact to developers when they port their applications to CE 6.0.

Windows ce 6.0 chrome